1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 16 F.2d
  5. 16 F.2d 392 (1927)
 

RAPP v. KING

No. 4620.

16 F.2d 392 (1927)

RAPP v. KING.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

January 6, 1927.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Otto Pfleger, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Colon Schott, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for plaintiff in error.

Chas. H. Stephens, Jr., of Cincinnati, Ohio (Stephens, Lincoln & Stephens, of Cincinnati, Ohio, and B. S. Wilson, of Ashland, Ky., on the brief), for defendant in error.

Before DENISON and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges, and WESTENHAVER, District Judge.

WESTENHAVER, District Judge.

This is an action upon a contract. The plaintiff in error, also plaintiff below, recovered a verdict and judgment for $550.90. As he wants more, he prosecutes error to reverse the judgment. Numerous complaints are made, which can be best understood and disposed of by a rather full statement of the issues and of the rulings of the trial court.

Plaintiff's petition alleges that on March 10, 1919, defendant, a producer of coal, agreed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases