METZ v. KNOBEL

No. 363.

21 F.2d 317 (1927)

METZ v. KNOBEL et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 26, 1927.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene S. Bibb, of New York City, and Allen & Fletcher, of Minneapolis, Minn. (John Marx, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Levy & Levy, of New York City (Ellis V. Levy, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.


SWAN, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The judgment should have been brought up for review by writ of error rather than appeal. However, such errors of form may be ignored. Brown v. Leo, 12 F.2d 350 (C. C. A. 2).

The appellant, who will be referred to hereinafter as the plaintiff, states that the theory of his suit is recovery upon the decree entered by the referee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases