MOELLER v. SCRANTON GLASS INSTRUMENT CO.

No. 3555.

19 F.2d 14 (1927)

MOELLER et al. v. SCRANTON GLASS INSTRUMENT CO., Inc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

April 27, 1927.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Otto R. Barnett and Percival H. Truman, both of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs in error.

Reese H. Harris (of Knapp, O'Malley, Hill & Harris) and Jerome I. Myers (of Tinkham & Myers), both of Scranton, Pa., for defendant in error.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.


BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

The question involved in this case is whether the bill in the patent case complies with equity rule No. 25. The purpose of these rules was to define the issue the plaintiff was to try, and so advise the defendant as to enable him to prepare to meet such issue. This was to be done, as stated in the rule, by "a short and simple statement of the ultimate facts upon which the plaintiff asks relief, omitting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases