REES v. LOMBARD

No. 5051.

21 F.2d 276 (1927)

REES et al. v. LOMBARD et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Appellees' Motion for Modification of Judgment Denied October 3, 1927.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William K. White and Charles M. Fryer, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.

Alexander D. Keyes, Herbert W. Erskine, and Morse Erskine, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Before GILBERT, RUDKIN, and DIETRICH, Circuit Judges.


DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs below (appellees here), as stockholders of the Progressive Evaporator Company, Inc., hereinafter called the Progressive Company, brought this suit in its behalf to enjoin the defendants, other than the Progressive Company, from infringing patent 1,413,135, covering a fruit-drying apparatus. Defendant Rees, the inventor, applied for the patent, but assigned the application to the Rees Blowpipe Manufacturing Company, a corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases