TRAITEL MARBLE CO. v. U. T. HUNGERFORD BRASS & COPPER CO.

No. 148.

22 F.2d 259 (1927)

TRAITEL MARBLE CO. v. U. T. HUNGERFORD BRASS & COPPER CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

November 1, 1927.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Darby & Darby and Samuel E. Darby, Jr., all of New York City, for appellant.

Robert W. Hardie, of New York City, for appellee.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.


L. HAND, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The general attack upon the invention we answered in our earlier opinion, and we need add nothing to what we there said, except in so far as Meinzer's patent may be thought to affect the result. It is quite plain that Mainzer had no such notion as Calkins. It is quite true that he disclosed brass strips, in some instances sunk into the concrete, to mark out the pattern of the mosaic, and that he spoke of lugs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases