1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 31 F.2d
  5. 31 F.2d 988 (1927)
 

CLAUDE NEON LIGHTS v. RAINBOW LIGHT

31 F.2d 988 (1927)

CLAUDE NEON LIGHTS, Inc., v. RAINBOW LIGHT, Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

March 9, 1927.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Bohleber, of New York City (Edwin J. Prindle, of New York City, of counsel), for complainant.

Darby & Darby, of New York City, for defendants.

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, District Judge.

I have allowed nearly all of the interrogatories proposed by the complainant. I suspect that they involve unnecessary reduplication, but it is difficult for me to determine that in a mechanico-chemical patent, and I had better err on the right side, as thus no harm can be done if the questions are proper in themselves. I would suggest, however, that counsel confer and see if as a result some, if not many, of the interrogatories cannot...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases