IN RE JOHNSON

No. 14253.

18 F.2d 965 (1926)

In re JOHNSON.

District Court, E. D. New York.

November 13, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robbins, Wells & Housel, of Bay Shore, N. Y., for bankrupt.

Neil P. Cullom, of New York City, for trustee.


MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

The bankrupt, William S. Johnson, and his business associate, Clarence Dominy, refuse to answer certain questions put to them at a hearing conducted by the referee, upon the alleged ground that the answers would tend to incriminate them.

Counsel for the bankrupt, in a memorandum submitted to this court, said that the reason for the refusal of the witness to testify was "that the merchandise which the bankrupt had bought and sold...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases