CHRISTENSEN v. NATIONAL BRAKE & ELECTRIC CO.


10 F.2d 856 (1926)

CHRISTENSEN v. NATIONAL BRAKE & ELECTRIC CO.

District Court, E. D. Wisconsin.

Supplemental Opinion March 2, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lines, Spooner & Quarles, of Milwaukee, Wis., Joseph B. Cotton, of New York City, and Wm. R. Rummler, of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Brown, Boettcher & Dienner, of Chicago, Ill., for defendant.


GEIGER, District Judge.

It is difficult, in a written opinion, to deal with all exceptions assigned upon the master's report. The views given upon the principal contentions will justify the court in declining to restate the account, howsoever desirable that might ordinarily be. If, upon the rulings now to be made, the parties and the master can recast the account without further testimony, I am confident that they can do it far more readily than can the court. In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases