1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 10 F.2d
  5. 10 F.2d 812 (1926)
 

MILLS NOVELTY CO. v. RUDOLPH WURLITZER CO.

Nos. 1483, 1484.

10 F.2d 812 (1926)

MILLS NOVELTY CO. v. RUDOLPH WURLITZER CO. LESLEY & SCHOEN v. SAME.

District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

January 26, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dyrenforth, Lee, Chritton & Wiles, of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Charles S. Burton and Thomas H. Sheridan, both of Chicago, Ill. (Robert H. Parkinson, of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for defendant.

CARPENTER, District Judge.

In the first suit, defendant's two devices are charged to infringe claim 1 of the Sandell patent, No. 852,848, and of these the newer device is charged also to infringe claims 2 and 3 thereof. In the second suit, both devices are charged to infringe claim 11 of the Lesley and Enz patent, No. 1,198,860, and the first device is charged also to infringe claim 10 thereof, and claims 3, 4, and 5 of the Lesley and Schoen patent, No. 1,198,861...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases