1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 10 F.2d
  5. 10 F.2d 772 (1926)
 

NEUSS, HESSLEIN & CO. v. VAN DER STEGEN

No. 4662.

10 F.2d 772 (1926)

NEUSS, HESSLEIN & CO. v. VAN DER STEGEN.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied March 22, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Garret W. McEnerney and Andrew F. Burke, both of San Francisco, Cal. (Davies & Bryan, of Shanghai, China, and Gustav Lange, Jr., of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

Chickering & Gregory, Warren Gregory, and Blair S. Shuman, all of San Francisco, Cal., and Fessenden, Holcomb & Snyder, of Shanghai, China, for defendant in error.

Before HUNT, RUDKIN, and MORROW, Circuit Judges.

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

Defendant in error brought action on June 19, 1920, in the United States District Court for China against plaintiff in error for an alleged breach of a contract. The parties will hereinafter be designated plaintiff and defendant, as in the court below.

During the period involved in this controversy, plaintiff, L. Van der Stegen, was a citizen of Belgium, doing business in Shanghai, China, under the name of the Belgian Trading Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases