1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 10 F.2d
  5. 10 F.2d 745 (1926)
 

WEIDERMAN v. UNITED STATES

No. 7059.

10 F.2d 745 (1926)

WEIDERMAN v. UNITED STATES.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

February 8, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. A. Breckenridge, of Tulsa, Okl. (Charles R. Bostick, of Tulsa, Okl., on the brief), for plaintiff in error.

W. F. Rampendahl, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Muskogee, Okl. (Frank Lee, U. S. Atty., of Muskogee, Okl., on the brief), for the United States.

Before KENYON and VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judges, and YOUMANS, District Judge.

YOUMANS, District Judge.

The errors urged by counsel for plaintiff in error, in oral argument and in their brief, are four in number.

1. The first is that the verdict is inconsistent, in that plaintiff in error was found guilty on the first count of the information and not guilty on the second. The testimony on the part of the government tended to show sales of alcohol to two individuals on the same occasion. It is argued on behalf of plaintiff in error that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases