TRUSLER v. CROOKS

No. 188.

269 U.S. 475 (1926)

TRUSLER v. CROOKS, AS COLLECTOR AND INDIVIDUALLY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 11, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. E.R. Morrison for plaintiff in error.


MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

Plaintiff in error seeks to recover two hundred dollars paid for internal revenue stamps which, after due protest, he affixed to a written "privilege or option for a contract for the sale of grain in the form commonly known as an indemnity," as required by § 3, "The Future Trading Act," approved August 24, 1921, c. 86, 42 Stat. 187. If, as he insists, that section...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases