SUPERIOR SKYLIGHT CO. v. ZERBE CONST. CO.

No. 173.

10 F.2d 710 (1926)

SUPERIOR SKYLIGHT CO., Inc., v. ZERBE CONST. CO., Inc., et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

February 1, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. Warland, of New York City, for appellant.

Cox, Kent & Campbell, of New York City (Clarence G. Campbell, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

We agree that the decree was right, but not for the reasons given. To us it seems that the patent was infringed, but invalid, if interpreted to cover the defendant's skylight. We rely for anticipation upon Freeman's article in volume 27 of the Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. The only differences between the defendant's skylight and Freeman's windows are that his were set in the walls of the rigging loft and were held by fusible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases