BOYLE v. ROUSSO

No. 7289.

16 F.2d 666 (1926)

BOYLE et al. v. ROUSSO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

November 30, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred M. Allen, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Allen & Allen, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for appellants.

Joshua R. H. Potts, of Chicago, Ill. (Brayton G. Richards, of Chicago, Ill., and Fryberger, Fulton, Hoshour & Ziesmer, of Duluth, Minn., on the brief), for appellee.

Before SANBORN, Circuit Judge, and WOODROUGH and SCOTT, District Judges.


WALTER H. SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

By this appeal the defendants below, Boyle, Robertson, and Burlingame, copartners as the Duluth Linen Supply Company, seek the reversal of that part of the decree which adjudges design patent No. 42,398, issued April 9, 1912, to the complainant Jacques Rousso, for a new ornamental design for a towel cabinet, valid and infringed by the defendants, and that they pay $250 damages and cease their infringement.

On January 5, 1912...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases