1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 16 F.2d
  5. 16 F.2d 540 (1926)
 

HAAS BROS. FABRICS CORPORATION v. BLISS, FABYAN & CO.

No. 1861.

16 F.2d 540 (1926)

HAAS BROS. FABRICS CORPORATION v. BLISS, FABYAN & CO.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Decided December 6, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. H. Benjamin, of Washington, D. C., and Ira Hirshfield, of New York City, for appellant.

G. P. Dike, of Boston, Mass., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice, and HATFIELD, Judge of the United States Court of Customs Appeals.

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, sustaining an opposition to the registration of a trade-mark.

The opposers, Bliss, Fabyan & Co., are sole distributors for numerous manufacturers of cotton and artificial silk goods. Among these are crinkly seersucker fabrics composed of cotton, or of cotton and artificial silk, used in large part for dresses for women and children. In January, 1910, they adopted the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases