HECHT v. ALFARO

No. 4588.

10 F.2d 464 (1926)

HECHT v. ALFARO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 1, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. U. Brandenstein and R. A. Carter, both of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff in error.

Goldman & Altman, of San Francisco, Cal., for defendant in error.

Before GILBERT, HUNT, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges.


GILBERT, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The only rulings of the trial court presented by the bill of exceptions and assignments of error are rulings upon the admission of testimony. The plaintiff in his brief makes but cursory reference to those rulings, and we shall discuss them with like brevity. It was not error to require the plaintiff to say whether he made any complaint to the defendant when he ascertained that the coffee was not shipped on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases