1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 16 F.2d
  5. 16 F.2d 432 (1926)
 

LAURIDSEN v. ALEXANDER

No. 4744.

16 F.2d 432 (1926)

LAURIDSEN et al. v. ALEXANDER et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

December 20, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. C. Reagan and Edwin H. Flick, both of Seattle, Wash., for appellants.

Wesley Lloyd, of Tacoma, Wash., and George Dysart and C. D. Cunningham, both of Centralia, Wash., for appellees.

Before RUDKIN, Circuit Judge, and DIETRICH and KERRIGAN, District Judges.

DIETRICH, District Judge.

In its legal aspect this case is identical with No. 4742, Katie Roberts Wilson v. Margaret Jane Robinson et al., 16 F.2d 431, this day decided, and for the reasons assigned in that case the decree is affirmed, as there modified.

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge, dissents, for the reason stated in Wilson v. Robinson...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases