UTAH CONST. CO. v. UNITED STATES

No. 4788.

15 F.2d 21 (1926)

UTAH CONST. CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES, to Use of LINDSTROM (DANIEL CONTRACTING CO. et al., Interveners).

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied November 15, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

B. M. Aikins, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs in error.

H. W. Hutton, Fletcher G. Flaherty, and Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, all of San Francisco, Cal. (Gregory A. Harrison, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for defendants in error.

Before GILBERT, HUNT, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges.


HUNT, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The contention of the plaintiffs in error, that the findings of fact set forth in the statement are wholly unsupported by evidence, cannot be sustained. The testimony is that, before the execution of the contract with Paul, Samuels, vice president and general manager of the Wattis-Samuels Company, met Paul; that Paul told him that he expected to secure material for the weir from the bed of the Sacramento river...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases