1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 16 F.2d
  5. 16 F.2d 274 (1926)
 

PINE v. EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DIST.

No. 4890.

16 F.2d 274 (1926)

PINE v. EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DIST. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

November 29, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D. Hadsell, Joe G. Sweet, and E. A. Ingalls, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

T. P. Wittschen, of Oakland, Cal. (Markell C. Baer and Geo. W. Lupton, Jr., both of Oakland, Cal., of counsel), for appellees.

Before GILBERT and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges, and JAMES, District Judge.

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This was a suit by a taxpayer to restrain the East Bay municipal utility district, a municipal utility district organized under the laws of the state of California, from entering into certain contracts and from incurring certain obligations. The jurisdiction of the court below was invoked upon the ground that the matter in controversy exceeded, exclusive of interest and costs, the sum or value of $3...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases