1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 10 F.2d
  5. 10 F.2d 269 (1926)
 

BALDWIN LAW PUB. CO. v. MOG

No. 4404.

10 F.2d 269 (1926)

BALDWIN LAW PUB. CO. v. MOG.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

January 5, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith W. Bennett, of Columbus, Ohio, for appellant.

Stuart R. Bolin, of Columbus, Ohio, for appellee.

Forrest F. Smith, of Columbus, Ohio, in pro. per.

Before DONAHUE, MOORMAN, and KNAPPEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

While there is a direct conflict in the testimony material to the issues presented by these motions, nevertheless it appears by a clear preponderance of the evidence that the plaintiff company authorized its counsel to enter into the agreement of settlement upon the terms and conditions named therein, and that substantially the only complaint made by the plaintiff through its president, Baldwin, after the decree was entered, was in reference to the fee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases