VAPOR CAR HEATING CO. v. GOLD CAR HEATING & LIGHTING CO.

No. 99.

16 F.2d 194 (1926)

VAPOR CAR HEATING CO. et al. v. GOLD CAR HEATING & LIGHTING CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

December 20, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Otto R. Barnett and Percival H. Truman, both of Chicago, Ill., and Alfred W. Kiddle and Wylie C. Margeson, both of New York City, for appellants.

William A. Redding, Arthur C. Fraser, Ambrose L. O'Shea, and Redding, Greeley, O'Shea & Campbell, all of New York City, for appellee.

Before HOUGH and MANTON, Circuit Judges, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, District Judge.


HOUGH, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

Argument at bar, and indeed the opinions below, show that we did not succeed in being perfectly clear in Gold v. Newton, supra. By whatever paths reached, or for whatever reasons given, our holding in that case was that Weber, 403,162, anticipated Edward Gold's application for a patent broadly covering the convertible system, and that holding, since Edward had won priority over Egbert Gold, involved the conclusion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases