DIAMOND MATCH CO. v. SUN MATCH CORPORATION

No. 80.

16 F.2d 1 (1926)

DIAMOND MATCH CO. v. SUN MATCH CORPORATION.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

December 6, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Redding and John R. Nolan, both of New York City, for appellant.

William Houston Kenyon, Edgar F. Baumgartner, and Arthur H. Serrell, all of New York City, for appellee.

Before HOUGH, HAND, and MACK, Circuit Judges.


HOUGH, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

It may be, and we think is, admitted that in its entirety the combination of parts producing a mechanism capable of doing what this machine does is an invention of importance, and both by its commercial success and the surmounted difficulties of co-ordinate operation, deserving of that sympathetic consideration, usually expressed by granting a wide range of equivalents.

This doctrine needs no citation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases