HAMBUECHEN v. SCHORGER

No. 1801.

10 F.2d 1006 (1926)

HAMBUECHEN v. SCHORGER.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Decided February 1, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. H. Brickenstein and C. H. Potter, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

W. B. Morton, A. B. Marvin, and M. D. Jackson, all of New York City, for appellee.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, ROBB, Associate Justice, and BLAND, Judge of the United States Court of Customs Appeals.


ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office in an interference proceeding, awarding priority of invention to the senior party and patentee, Schorger.

There is little or no dispute as to the facts. The invention is a simple one, and relates to a dry cell, such as is used in flash lights; the advance over the prior art consisting in dipping the core of the cell "in a magma to form a bibulous...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases