1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 31 F.2d
  5. 31 F.2d 983 (1926)
 

CLAUDE NEON LIGHTS v. E. MACHLETT & SON

31 F.2d 983 (1926)

CLAUDE NEON LIGHTS, Inc., v. E. MACHLETT & SON.

District Court, E. D. New York.

On Reargument January 22, 1927.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Bohleber, of New York City (Edwin J. Prindle, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Darby & Darby, of New York City, for defendant.

INCH, District Judge.

Objections to interrogatories in a patent suit. Plaintiff possesses a patent for a method for separating neon from gases with which it is mixed. It is a process patent relating "to a process for purifying the neon from the gases with which it is mixed." Claude patent, No. 1,191,495.

The suit is at issue. Plaintiff submits 51 interrogatories. Defendant has no objection to answering all these interrogatories except 3, 5, 14, 20, 25, 26...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases