1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 10 F.2d
  5. 10 F.2d 1001 (1926)
 

CLARK v. BIRDSEY

No. 1817.

10 F.2d 1001 (1926)

CLARK v. BIRDSEY.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Decided February 1, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. E. Mehlhope and C. H. Poole, both of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

W. C. Jones, A. A. Olson, and A. B. Seibold, all of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This is an interference proceeding involving priority of invention to an improved edge for plaster board. The counts of the issue describe a board having the opposite edges thereof covered or partially covered by the infolded edge of the papers forming the face covering of the finished board. Prior to this discovery, the board was produced with the sheet on one side of the board of sufficient width to fold over the edge of the plastic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases