1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 12 F.2d
  5. 12 F.2d 991 (1926)
 

VOGUE CO. v. VOGUE HAT CO.

No. 4066.

12 F.2d 991 (1926)

VOGUE CO. v. VOGUE HAT CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 17, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel W. Banning, Thos. A. Banning, Thos. A. Banning, Jr., Ehpraim Banning, all of Chicago, Ill., Chas. H. Studin, of New York City, and Rathbun Fuller, of Toledo, Ohio, for petitioner.

E. J. Marshall, of Toledo, Ohio, and Harry D. Nims, MacDonald DeWitt, and Minturn de S. Verdi, all of New York City, for respondent.

Before DENISON, MACK, and DONAHUE, Circuit Judges.

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

A bill was filed by the plaintiff, a New York corporation, in the District Court at Cleveland, against Thompson & Co., a Cleveland corporation, which was retailing hats manufactured by the Vogue Hat Company, a New York corporation, and it was alleged that these hats were being sold in violation of the rights indicated by the plaintiff's registered trade-mark and by means of fraudulent and unfair competition.

There was jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases