BORTMAN v. URBAN MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRIES

No. 198.

4 F.2d 913 (1925)

BORTMAN v. URBAN MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRIES, Inc., et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

January 5, 1925.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hector M. Hitchings, of New York City, for appellants.

Kohlman & Austrian and D. Basil O'Connor, all of New York City (Saul J. Lance and Carl J. Austrian, both of New York City, of counsel), for receivers.

Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

The docketing of appellants' judgment gave them a lien upon the real estate of the above-named defendant, and it may be said that one object of this suit was to prevent the enforcement of that lien by execution. At all events, this suit seems to have been used for that purpose.

Probably the court below, in entering the ordinary order appointing receivers in cases like this, did not have the lien rights of Berger and Joy called to its attention...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases