GEORGE D. HARTER BANK v. INGLIS

Nos. 4295-4299.

6 F.2d 841 (1925)

GEORGE D. HARTER BANK OF CANTON, OHIO, v. INGLIS (and four other cases).

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

July 3, 1925.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. M. Horn, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Homer E. Black, of Canton, Ohio (Herbruck, Black, McCuskey & Ruff, of Canton, Ohio, and Dustin, McKeehan, Merrick, Arter & Stewart, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

Luther Day, of Cleveland, Ohio (Day & Day, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Rufus S. Day, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for receiver.

Wendell Lilly, of Columbus, Ohio (Lemuel D. Lilly, of Columbus, Ohio, and Tolles, Hogsett, Ginn & Morley and J. C. Little, all of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellees who were intervening claimants in the court below.

Before DENISON, DONAHUE, and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges.


MOORMAN, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

In the first four cases there is presented primarily the question of the jurisdiction of the District Court to determine the controversy between the bank and the intervening claimants. Each of the claimants was a resident of the state of Ohio, the bank was a state institution, and no one of the claims was for as much as $3,000. The jurisdictional question was not raised in the lower court. The fund was drawn...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases