MASURY v. BELL

No. 1754.

6 F.2d 708 (1925)

MASURY et al. v. BELL.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Decided June 1, 1925.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. A. Redding and W. B. Greeley, of New York City, and H. H. Semmes, of Washington, D. C., for appellants.

J. H. Milans and C. T. Milans, both of Washington, D. C., and Albert C. Nolte, of New York City (Edmund Quincy Moses, of New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.


ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office in an interference proceeding, awarding priority to the senior party, Bell.

The invention is a suspension link of flexible, inelastic, nonmetallic material used in connecting the springs of automobiles to the chassis frame. Count 1 of the two counts is sufficiently illustrative and reads as follows:

"1. In automobile construction, in combination with the metallic frame of the chassis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases