BUCKLEY v. OCEANIC S. S. CO.

No. 4369.

5 F.2d 545 (1925)

BUCKLEY v. OCEANIC S. S. CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied June 22, 1925.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

S. T. Hogevoll, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff in error.

Irving H. Frank and Nathan H. Frank, both of San Francisco, Cal., for defendant in error.

Before GILBERT, HUNT, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges.


HUNT, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

Plaintiff in error contends that in suing for two days' pay for each day's delay in payment of wages claimed to be due to him as an able seaman (section 4529, Rev. St. [Comp. St. § 8320]) his action is for a penalty, and therefore governed by section 1047, Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 1712), which provides that no suit for any penalty accruing under the laws of the United States shall be maintained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases