HRUSKA v. PARKE, DAVIS & CO.

No. 6726.

6 F.2d 536 (1925)

HRUSKA v. PARKE, DAVIS & CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

June 4, 1925.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lon O. Hocker, of St. Louis, Mo. (Jones, Hocker, Sullivan & Angert and Ralph T. Finley, all of St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for plaintiff in error.

Thomas Bond, of St. Louis, Mo. (Rassieur & Goodwin, of St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for defendant in error.

Before SANBORN and LEWIS, Circuit Judges, and POLLOCK, District Judge.


POLLOCK, District Judge.

The question presented for review in this case is clear and direct. Did the trial court commit error in sustaining the general demurrer to the third amended petition of plaintiff and in entering final judgment against plaintiff? A reading and statement of the facts found in the petition, well pleaded, hence by the demurrer admitted, may be summarized as follows:

Defendant corporation is and was engaged in the business of manufacturing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases