1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 8 F.2d
  5. 8 F.2d 529 (1925)
 

UNITED STATES v. CARROLL CHAIN CO.

No. 2326.

8 F.2d 529 (1925)

UNITED STATES v. CARROLL CHAIN CO.

District Court, S. D. Ohio, E. D.

July 16, 1925.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Haveth E. Mau, U. S. Atty., of Cincinnati, Ohio, and A. W. Gregg, Sol. Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C. (Floyd F. Toomey, of Washington, D. C., and George G. Witter, of Missoula, Mont., of counsel), for the United States.

W. B. McLeskey, of Columbus, Ohio, for defendant.

At the close of the argument the court rendered the following opinion from the bench:

HICKENLOOPER, District Judge.

This matter is so very clear in the court's mind at this time that I see no very substantial reason for postponing the giving of my opinion to counsel, nor for the delay and trouble incident to the preparation of a more detailed opinion in the case. What I am saying now is being taken down, and it will be sufficient for the needs of the government...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases