HAMMER v. ROBERTSON

Nos. 202, 203.

6 F.2d 460 (1925)

HAMMER v. ROBERTSON, Commissioner of Patents. In re HAMMER.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

February 20, 1925.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wm. E. Warland, of New York City, for appellant.

Ralph C. Greene, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Wm. A. De Groot, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for appellee.

Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Hammer, in prosecuting his application for a patent, encountered no opposition from other parties claiming the same asserted invention. There was no interference. His only opposition (so to speak) was from the Examiners; i. e., the Office. His was, in common parlance, an ex parte, not an inter partes, proceeding.

By this appeal he seeks to present a question not without interest, viz.: Is there any remedy under R. S. § 4915 (Comp. St...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases