1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 6 F.2d
  5. 6 F.2d 36 (1925)
 

NEW YORK, N. H. & H. R. CO. v. PULLMAN CO.

No. 2391.

6 F.2d 36 (1925)

NEW YORK, N. H. & H. R. CO. et al. v. PULLMAN CO.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

June 1, 1925.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George D. Watrous, of New Haven, Conn. (Watrous, Day, Hewitt, Steele & Sheldon, of New Haven, Conn., and Moorfield Storey, of Boston, Mass., on the brief), for plaintiffs.

Arthur M. Marsh, of Bridgeport, Conn. (Marsh, Stoddard & Day, of Bridgeport, Conn., on the brief), for defendant.

THOMAS, District Judge.

This bill in equity was brought to compel the specific performance of a certain contract made and entered into between New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, plaintiff, and the Pullman Company, defendant. Subsequently, and upon motion granted, the bill was amended. The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the bill as amended for insufficiency, and it is this motion that is now before the court.

The suit was originally...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases