GARDNER v. DAUGHERTY


10 F.2d 373 (1925)

GARDNER v. DAUGHERTY et al.

District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D.

December 18, 1925.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis W. McClear, of Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff.

Robert M. Toms, of Detroit, Mich., for defendants.


TUTTLE, District Judge.

Even though a slot machine indicates, before the deposit of the coin, exactly what the depositor will receive for such coin, but such machine does not indicate, until the deposit of such coin, what the depositor of the next subsequent coin to be deposited will receive in return for such next subsequent coin, such a machine is a gambling device within the meaning of the law, for the reason that such machine obviously induces the deposit of coins...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases