HUNT, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
It is contended that neither count charges a public offense, for the reason that count 1 is "indefinite as to the time and place and as to the party charged," and that count 2 does not state any place that was maintained by plaintiff in error for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor. The contentions have no merit. In count 1 Walker is named, the date is averred, and the premises are definitely described...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.