1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 6 F.2d
  5. 6 F.2d 102 (1925)
 

UNITED STATES v. BELLINGHAM BAY IMPROVEMENT CO.

No. 4348.

6 F.2d 102 (1925)

UNITED STATES v. BELLINGHAM BAY IMPROVEMENT CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 15, 1925.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

S. W. Williams, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.

Clinton W. Howard, of Bellingham, Wash., for appellees.

Before ROSS, HUNT, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges.

HUNT, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

To cases of the general character of that before us, where the government seeks to cancel a patent on the ground that it has been obtained through deception, perjury, and fraud, the doctrine announced in Bailey v. Glover, 88 U. S. (21 Wall.) 342, 22 L. Ed. 636, Exploration Co. v. United States, 247 U.S. 435, 38 S.Ct. 571, 62 L. Ed. 1200, and United States v. Diamond Coal Co., ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases