1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 2 F.2d
  5. 2 F.2d 88 (1924)
 

CALIFORNIA PRUNE & APRICOT GROWERS v. WOOD & SELICK

2 F.2d 88 (1924)

CALIFORNIA PRUNE & APRICOT GROWERS, Inc., v. WOOD & SELICK, Inc.

District Court, S. D. New York.

October 16, 1924.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pitkin & Rosensohn, of New York City (Wolcott H. Pitkin, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Myers & Goldsmith and Thomas, Houghton & Shepard, all of New York City (Norman M. Behr, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

KNOX, District Judge.

The pleadings now before the court are so voluminous, and so involved, as to make difficult an intelligent statement of their contents. No little effort has been expended in an attempt to set forth the exact situation in which the parties find themselves after the succession of pleadings, counter pleadings, and motions that have characterized this suit. The maze is so complete that I have determined to attempt little more than to barely decide...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases