1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 2 F.2d
  5. 2 F.2d 601 (1924)
 

SCHERZER ROLLING LIFT BRIDGE CO. v. CITY OF CHICAGO

No. 1479.

2 F.2d 601 (1924)

SCHERZER ROLLING LIFT BRIDGE CO. v. CITY OF CHICAGO et al.

District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

November 24, 1924.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cassels, Potter & Bentley, Barry Gilbert, and Geo. I. Haight, all of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Dyrenforth, Lee, Chritton & Wiles, Geo. A. Chritton, Russell Wiles, and Francis X. Busch, Corp. Counsel, all of Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, being the assignee of the original patentees and owner of letters patent No. 735,414, issued August 4, 1903, brought this suit, alleging infringement of the patent by the construction of a certain bridge by the defendants in 1920 across the Chicago river at Michigan avenue, commonly known as the Michigan Boulevard bridge. The patent has expired since the suit was begun.

The defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases