HOBBS, WALL & CO. v. PETTERSON

No. 4286.

2 F.2d 594 (1924)

HOBBS, WALL & CO. v. PETTERSON.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

November 24, 1924.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jones & Dall and Esmond Schapiro, all of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff in error.

H. W. Hutton, of San Francisco, Cal., for defendant in error.

Before GILBERT, HUNT, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges.


RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This is a writ of error to review a judgment in an action at law tried by the court without a jury pursuant to a written stipulation of the parties. The sufficiency of the testimony to support the general finding in favor of the defendant in error is the only question presented for our consideration. The defendant in error was employed as second officer on the steamer Crescent City, and while engaged in lowering the cargo booms to make the ship...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases