THE GOYAZ

Nos. 49, 50.

3 F.2d 553 (1924)

THE GOYAZ

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

November 3, 1924.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bigham, Englar & Jones, of New York City (D. Roger Englar and Henry B. Potter, both of New York City, of counsel), for libelants-appellants.

Purrington & McConnell, of New York City (William A. Purrington, Frank J. McConnell, and James D. Brown, all of New York City, of counsel), for claimant-appellee.

Burlingham, Veeder, Masten & Fearey, of New York City (Charles Burlingham and Carl G. Stearns, both of New York City, of counsel), for Thomsen & Co.

Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.


HOUGH, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

These appeals present but a single question of fact. That question arises from the pleadings in the following manner:

Libelants charge that the hides went aboard in good condition and came off in bad. Prima facie that was enough to make out their case, if true; but libelants went further and averred that the damage was caused by contact with sea water, and the unseaworthiness of the Goyaz, while claimant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases