SCHWARTZ v. SACKS

No. 4091.

2 F.2d 188 (1924)

SCHWARTZ et al. v. SACKS et al.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Decided November 3, 1924.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. S. Huidekoper, of Washington, D. C., for appellants.

J. A. O'Shea, of Washington, D. C., for appellees.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.


MARTIN, Chief Justice.

This suit was begun in the Supreme Court of the District, by the present appellees as complainants, against the appellants as defendants, for the cancellation of a certain deed of trust, and also of a certain promissory note, in so far as it purported to be the obligation of said complainant Anna Sacks Goldenberg, upon the claim that both the note and the deed of trust were illegal and void. The defendants severally answered, maintaining that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases