1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 2 F.2d
  5. 2 F.2d 1014 (1924)
 

BAYER CO. v. AMERICAN SHIPBUILDING CO.

No. 4082.

2 F.2d 1014 (1924)

BAYER CO. v. AMERICAN SHIPBUILDING CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

December 2, 1924.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chas. E. Brock and Hull, Brock & West, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

Kelley, David & Cottrell, of Cleveland, Ohio, for American Shipbuilding Co. Fay, Oberlin & Fay, Jesse B. Fay, and Horace B. Fay, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for Douglas Brews.

Before DENISON, MACK, and DONAHUE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant Shipbuilding Company had a written license from the defendant patentee to use the invention for a specified purpose. It proceeded to use the invention for a purpose which might or might not be within its license, according to the true construction. It notified the patentee, who approved, and accepted royalty thereon. While this course of business was continuing, the plaintiff took an exclusive license under the same patent, but expressly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases