NATIONAL PROHIBITION CASES

Nos. 29, 30, Original, and Nos. 696, 752, 788, 794, 837.

253 U.S. 350 (1920)

NATIONAL PROHIBITION CASES.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 7, 1920.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Herbert A. Rice, Attorney General of Rhode Island, for the plaintiff in No. 29, Original. Mr. A.A. Capotosto, Assistant Attorney General, was on the briefs. See post, p. 354.

Mr. Thomas F. McCran, Attorney General of New Jersey, for the plaintiff in No. 30, Original. Mr. Francis H. McGee, Assistant Attorney General, was on the briefs. See post, p. 356.

Mr. Patrick Henry Kelley for the appellant in No. 696. See post, p. 357.

Mr. Levy Mayer and Mr. William Marshall Bullitt for the appellant in No. 752. See post, p. 357.

Mr. Elihu Root and Mr. William D. Guthrie for the appellant in No. 788. Mr. Robert Crain and Mr. Bernard Hershkopf were on the briefs. See post, pp. 361, 368.

Mr. Ralph W. Jackman for the appellee in No. 794. Mr. William H. Austin was on the brief. See post, p. 380.

Mr. Charles A. Houts, Mr. John T. Fitzsimmons and Mr. Edward C. Crow, for the appellant in No. 837, submitted. See post, p. 380.

The Solicitor General and Mr. William L. Frierson, Assistant Attorney General of the United States, for the defendants in No. 29, Original, the appellees in Nos. 752 and 788, and the appellants in No. 794. Mr. Frierson for the defendants in No. 30, Original, and for the appellees in No. 696, The Solicitor General appearing also on the briefs in those cases. The Solicitor General and Mr. Frierson, for the appellees in No. 837, submitted. See post, p. 381.

Mr. Levy Mayer and Mr. William Marshall Bullitt for the appellant in No. 752:

Mr. Root for the appellant in No. 788:

Mr. Guthrie for the appellant in No. 788:

Messrs. Houts, Fitzsimmons and Crow, for the appellant in No. 837, submitted, on the following main propositions:


MR. JUSTICE VAN DEVANTER announced the conclusions of the court.

Power to amend the Constitution was reserved by Article V, which reads:

"The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases