1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 247 U.S.
  5. 247 U.S. 295 (1918)
 

HARTRANFT v. MULLOWNY

No. 19.

247 U.S. 295 (1918)

HARTRANFT v. MULLOWNY, JUDGE OF THE POLICE COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Supreme Court of United States.

Restored for reargument November 13, 1916.

Reargued November 7, 8, 1917.

Decided June 3, 1918.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Matthew E. O'Brien and Mr. Henry E. Davis, with whom Mr. Walter Jeffreys Carlin was on the briefs, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frierson for defendant in error.1

Restored to docket for reargument November 13, 1916.

MR. JUSTICE PITNEY delivered the opinion of the court.

On April 17, 1914, an information in behalf of the United States was filed by the United States attorney in the police court of the District of Columbia against the plaintiff in error (who will be called the petitioner) charging violations of the Food and Drugs Act of June 30, 1906, c. 3915, 34 Stat. 768. Having first objected to the jurisdiction of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases