FURNESS, WITHY & CO. v. YANG-TSZE INS. ASS'N.

No. 106.

242 U.S. 430 (1917)

FURNESS, WITHY & COMPANY, LIMITED, v. YANG-TSZE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, LIMITED, ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 8, 1917.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Norman B. Beecher, with whom Mr. Charles C. Burlingham and Mr. Roscoe H. Hupper were on the briefs, for petitioner.

Mr. D. Roger Englar and Mr. J. Parker Kirlin, with whom Mr. Lawrence Kneeland, Mr. John M. Woolsey and Mr. William H. McGrann were on the briefs, for respondents.


MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the court.

The writ of certiorari was improvidently granted and must be dismissed. We should have denied the petition therefor if the facts essential to an adequate appreciation to the situation had then been brought to our attention. Petitions of this character are at the risk of the party making them, and whenever in the progress of the cause facts develop which if disclosed on the application would have induced a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases