1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 242 U.S.
  5. 242 U.S. 272 (1916)
 

LONG SAULT DEVELOPMENT CO. v. CALL

No. 49.

242 U.S. 272 (1916)

LONG SAULT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. CALL (AS SUCCESSOR OF KENNEDY), AS TREASURER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

Supreme Court of United States.

Reargument June 12, 1916.

Reargued October 31, 1916.

Decided December 11, 1916.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Henry W. Taft, with whom Mr. Francis Sims McGrath was on the briefs, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Merton E. Lewis, with whom Mr. E.E. Woodbury, Attorney General of the State of New York, and Mr. C.T. Dawes were on the briefs, for defendant in error.

Restored to docket for reargument June 12, 1916.

MR. JUSTICE CLARKE delivered the opinion of the court.

This proceeding was commenced in the Supreme Court of New York by the Long Sault Development Company, hereinafter called the plaintiff, for the purpose of testing the constitutionality of an act of the legislature of that State, passed in 1907, to incorporate the plaintiff and to grant to it important rights in the bed of, and with respect to the use of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases