1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 240 U.S.
  5. 240 U.S. 103 (1916)
 

STANTON v. BALTIC MINING CO.

No. 359.

240 U.S. 103 (1916)

STANTON v. BALTIC MINING COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 21, 1916.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Charles A. Snow for appellant.

The Solicitor General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Wallace for the United States as amicus curiae in support of the decree appealed from.1

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the court.

As in Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R., ante, p. 1, this case was commenced by the appellant as a stockholder of the Baltic Mining Company, the appellee, to enjoin the voluntary payment by the corporation and its officers of the tax assessed against it under the Income Tax section of the Tariff Act of October 3, 1913, c. 16, § 2, 38 Stat. 166, 181...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases