NEWMAN v. FRIZZELL

No. 813.

238 U.S. 537 (1915)

NEWMAN v. UNITED STATES EX REL. FRIZZELL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 21, 1915.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Jackson H. Ralston and Mr. John W. Davis, with whom Mr. Wm. E. Richardson, Mr. George W. Hott and Mr. Conrad H. Syme were on the brief, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Joseph W. Bailey, with whom Mr. Arthur A. Birney and Mr. William J. Neale were on the brief, for defendant in error.


MR. JUSTICE LAMAR, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

1. Usurpation of a public office, from an early day was treated as a crime and, like all other crimes, could be prosecuted only in the name of the King by his duly authorized law officers. When a judgment was obtained against the intruder he was not only ousted from his office but fined for...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases