NADAL v. MAY

No. 130.

233 U.S. 447 (1914)

NADAL v. MAY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Restored for reargument January 26, 1914.

Reargued April 6, 7, 1914.

Decided April 20, 1914.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. N.B.K. Pettingill, with whom Mr. F.L. Cornwell was on the brief, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Felix Frankfurter, with whom Mr. Wolcott H. Pitkin, Jr., Attorney General of Porto Rico, was on the brief, for defendant in error:


Restored to docket for reargument January 26, 1914.

MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit by the plaintiff in error to establish his title to one-half interest in a plantation called `Carmen,' as devisee of his aunt, Altagracia Nadal. It is alleged that the plantation was bought with the separate money of Altagracia Nadal by her husband, after marriage; that she became the owner of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases